Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Coats (J. & P.) v Chadwick
• St. Mungo Manufacturing Company v Hutchinson Main & Company Ltd
• Daw v Eley

REFERS TO

• R v Payne
• Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company Ltd & Pneumatic Tyre Company Ltd v British & Colonial Motor Car Company Ltd
• Henderson v Laing, (1824)

[See more]

• McLauchlan v Carson
• Mullard Radio Valve Company Ltd v Rothermel Corporation Ltd
• Smith v Mitchell,

CONSIDERS

• Haskell Golf Ball Company v Hutchinson
• Mullard Radio Valve Company Ltd v Rothermel Corporation Ltd
• Gaskell & Chambers v Hudson, Dodsworth & Company

APPLIES

• Fenner v Wilson

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1960] 1 WLR 1145
• [1960] 3 All ER 289
• 1961 RPC 1

[See more]

• [1960] 104 SJ 869

FOLLOWED in

• Murray Hiebert v Chandra Sri Ram

APPLIED in

• Lazard Brothers and Company (Jersey) Ltd v Bois and Bois, Perrier and Labesse

This document cites

• Henderson v Laing, (1824)
• R v Payne
• Fenner v Wilson
• Mullard Radio Valve Company Ltd v Rothermel Corporation Ltd
• Gaskell & Chambers v Hudson, Dodsworth & Company



See all quotations

• McLauchlan v Carson
• Daw v Eley
• Haskell Golf Ball Company v Hutchinson
• Coats (J. & P.) v Chadwick
• Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company Ltd & Pneumatic Tyre Company Ltd v British & Colonial Motor Car Company Ltd
• St. Mungo Manufacturing Company v Hutchinson Main & Company Ltd
• Smith v Mitchell,