Harris v Birkenhead Corporation

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Wheat v E. Lacon & Company Ltd
• Hartwell v Grayson, Rollo & Clover Docks

REFERS TO

• Penny v Northampton Borough Council
• Addie (Robert) and Sons (Collieries) Ltd v Dumbreck

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Harris v Birkenhead Corporation

APPLIES

• James Pannett (an Infant) by his father and next friend James Pannett (Plaintiff Respondent) P. Mcguinness & Company, Ltd (Defendants Appellants)
• British Railways Board v Herrington

AFFIRMS

• Harris v Birkenhead Corporation

CONSIDERS

• Wheat v E. Lacon & Company Ltd
• Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 - Articles : S-2
• Housing Act 1957 - Articles : S-43

[See more]

• Housing Act 1957
• Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 - Articles : SCH-8
• Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 - Articles : S-11
• Civil Evidence Act 1968

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 74 LGR 229
• [1976] 1 All ER 341
• [1976] 1 WLR 279

CONSIDERED in

• The Queen v The City of Nottingham Justices and Another
• R (Bushell and Others) v Newcastle Licensing Justices and another

DISTINGUISHED in

• R (Bushell and Others) v Newcastle Licensing Justices and another

REFERRED in

• King v Liverpool City Council

CITED in

• Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council
• Jones v Bartlett

This document cites

---

• James Pannett (an Infant) by his father and next friend James Pannett (Plaintiff Respondent) P. Mcguinness & Company, Ltd (Defendants Appellants)
• Wheat v E. Lacon & Company Ltd
• Wheat v E. Lacon & Company Ltd
• British Railways Board v Herrington
• Addie (Robert) and Sons (Collieries) Ltd v Dumbreck



See all quotations

• Hartwell v Grayson, Rollo & Clover Docks
• Penny v Northampton Borough Council
• Harris v Birkenhead Corporation
• Compulsory Purchase Act 1965
• Housing Act 1957
• Civil Evidence Act 1968