Davis v Vale

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Jansen v Jansen
• Falconer v Falconer

APPLIES

• Pettitt v Pettitt

CONSIDERS

• Gissing v Gissing
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-37
• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1971] 2 All ER 1021
• [1971] 1 WLR 1022

REFERRED in

• Cowcher v Cowcher
• Shinh v Shinh
• Kowalczuk v Kowalczuk

[See more]

• Sterling (Barrington) v Zelta Gayle Sterling
• Haddad (Peter) v Arlene Beverley Haddad
• Keithroy Romeo Shaw Claimant v Cynthia Dorothy Shaw Defendant [ECSC]

CONSIDERED in

• Mr Abdulaziz Rashid v Mohammed Munir
• Cracknell v Cracknell
• Edey v Nurse

[See more]

• Clement v Clement
• Joy Ann Lewis v Calvin James

CITED in

• McKenzie (Marguerite) and Anthony McKenzie

This document cites

• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Jansen v Jansen
• Falconer v Falconer
• Gissing v Gissing
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970