Cowcher v Cowcher

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17
• Pettitt v Pettitt

REFERS TO

• Pitt v Pitt
• Oughtred v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Re Shephard. Shephard v Cartwright

[See more]

• Smith v Baker
• Ulrich v Ulrich and Felton
• Re Rhodesia Goldfields Ltd Partridge v Rhodesia Goldfields Ltd
• Balfour v Balfour
• Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw
• Bedson v Bedson
• Davis v Vale
• Falconer v Falconer
• Grey v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Hargrave v Newton (formerly Hargrave)
• Heseltine v Heseltine

CITES

• J v J
• Brett v Brett
• Chapman v Chapman

APPLIES

• Gissing v Gissing

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1972] 1 All ER 943
• [1972] 1 WLR 425

CONSIDERED in

• Joseph Power and Sinead Power v Ailish Brighton
• Atombrook Ltd v Heather Weston Dukes Court Travel Ltd
• McGrath v McGrath

[See more]

• Countrywide Austral Pty Ltd v Emergency Media Pty Ltd
• Kathleen Finch (Applicant) (Appellant) Kenneth Gordon Finch (Respondent)
• Hurst-Meyers v Public Trustee and Guardian for the ACT
• Tenth Vandy Pty Ltd v Natwest Markets Australia Pty Ltd
• Skyparks Group Plc v Marks and Another
• El Masri v Tran
• John Elefterios Kagelaris(plaintiff) v Peter Elefterios Kagelaris
• Amit Laundry Pty Ltd v Jain
• Nguyen v Scheiff
• Chisholm v Smith
• Crossley v Crossley
• Tonna v Mendonca
• Huntingford v Hobbs
• Lettsome v Lettsome
• Clement v Clement
• Murrell v Murrell
• Newman Francis v Keneisha Leneisha Ann-Marie Francis
• Peterkin v Peterkin
• Collymore v George
• Diane Lori Tabony v August Henry Tabony
• Derick Munnings Jr. v Edward Roker
• Opper v Vanterpool
• Fay Veronica Wint-Smith v Donald Anthony Smith
• Abbott v Abbott
• Walker v Hall

REFERRED in

• Harnett v Harnett
• Crisp v Mullings
• Debtor (No. 24 of 1971), Re A, ex parte Marleyv. Trustee of the Property of the Dobtor

[See more]

• Richards v Dove
• Re Nicholson, decd
• Shinh v Shinh
• Koh Cheong Heng v Ho Yee Fong
• Kowalczuk v Kowalczuk
• Bernard v Josephs
• Jacquline Elmay Christian v Octavious Christian
• WWF World Wide Fund for Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund) v World Wrestling Federation Entertainment Inc.
• Neo Tai Kim v Foo Stie Wah
• Smith v Cooper

CITED in

• Michael Cusack and William Cotter v Scroop Ltd and Others
• Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd
• Brown v George

[See more]

• The Official Receiver for Northern Ireland v Kearney
• Lau Siew Kim v Yeo Guan Chye Terence and Another
• Wee Chiaw Sek Anna v Ng Li-Ann Genevieve (sole executrix of the Estate of Ng Hock Seng, deceased) and Another
• Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd
• Collymore v George
• Forrest v Forrest
• Isadore Browne Appellant v Maria Roseta Browne Respondent [ECSC]

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Densham (A Bankrupt), Re, ex parte Trustee of the Property of the Bankrupt v The Bankrupt

FOLLOWED in

• Foo Stie Wah; Neo Tai Kim
• Tan Evelyn v Tan Lim Tai
• Yeo Guan Chye Terence and another v Lau Siew Kim

ADOPTED in

• Findlay (Selwyn) v Ingrid Findlay

DISTINGUISHED in

• Logan (David) v Hyacinth Vivienne Logan

APPLIED in

• McKenzie (Marguerite) and Anthony McKenzie