Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. P. Pikamäe, presentadas el 17 de junio de 2021.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF in

• Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. P. Pikamäe, presentadas el 17 de junio de 2021.

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales - Article 6
• Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos - Article 14
• Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos - Article 10
• Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel y Remedia d.o.o. contra Comisión Europea.
• Ziegler SA v European Commission.



See all quotations

• PI contra Landespolizeidirektion Tirol.
• Council of the European Union v European Commission.
• Council of the European Union v European Commission.
• Reino de España contra Consejo de la Unión Europea.
• Jozef Križan and Others v Slovenská inšpekcia životného prostredia.
• Council of the European Union v European Commission.
• Estado belga contra Marichal-Margrève SPRL.
• M. M. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and Attorney General.
• European Commission v Council of the European Union.
• Solvay SA v European Commission.
• M. M. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and Attorney General.
• Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community.
• Jean-Louis Burban contra Parlamento Europeo.
• Giovanni Pesce and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri - Dipartimento della Protezione Civile and Others.
• Fulvio Tortora v Commission of the European Communities.
• Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) v European Commission.
• Appeal — Admissibility — Representation of a party before the Court — Power of attorney given to the lawyer — Power of attorney withdrawn by the liquidator of the appellant company — Further steps in the proceedings by the decision-making body of the appellant company — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Action for annulment before the General Court of the European Union — Admissibility — Whether the shareholders of the company whose authorisation has been withdrawn are directly concerned.
• Republic of Poland v European Commission.
• Banif Plus Bank Zrt. v Márton Lantos and Mártonné Lantos.
• Koldo Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso v European Parliament.
• Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)
• Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• Tratado de la Unión Europea
• Servicio Europeo de Acción Exterior contra Stéphane De Loecker.
• European Commission v Danilo Di Bernardo.
• Comisión Europea contra RQ.
• Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 1er octobre 2020.#CC contre Parlement européen.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Arrêt du Tribunal statuant sur renvoi du Tribunal après l’annulation partielle de l’arrêt du Tribunal de la fonction publique du 21 juillet 2016, CC/Parlement (F‑9/12 RENV, EU:F:2016:165) – Recrutement – Concours général EUR/A/151/98 – Erreurs commises par le Parlement européen dans la gestion de la liste d’aptitude – Préjudice matériel – Recours en responsabilité non contractuelle.#Affaire C-612/19 P.
• R.N.N.S. and K.A. v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.
• John Dalli v European Commission.