Commission Decision (EU) 2019/56 of 28 May 2018 on aid scheme SA.34045 (2013/c) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 StromNEV (notified under document C(2018) 3166) (Text with EEA relevance.)

This document cites

• Dutton v Eaton
• Canterbury City Council Act 2013
• Beverley Freemen Act 2010
• Essent Netwerk Noord BV supported by Nederlands Elektriciteit Administratiekantoor BV v Aluminium Delfzijl BV, and in the indemnification proceedings Aluminium Delfzijl BV v Staat der Nederlanden and in the indemnification proceedings Essent Netwerk Noord BV v Nederlands Elektriciteit Administratiekantoor BV and Saranne BV.
• Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany.



See all quotations

• Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Entrate v Paint Graphos Soc. coop. arl (C-78/08), Adige Carni Soc. coop. arl, in liquidation v Agenzia delle Entrate and Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (C-79/08) and Ministero delle Finanze v Michele Franchetto (C-80/08).
• Steinike & Weinlig v Federal Republic of Germany.
• P Oy.
• European Commission v Hansestadt Lübeck.
• Openbaar Ministerie (Public Prosecutor) of the Kingdom of the v Jacobus Philippus van Tiggele.
• French Republic v Commission of the European Communities.
• Bouygues SA and Bouygues Télécom SA v European Commission and Others.
• Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd v TV2/Danmark A/S.
• European Commission v TV2/Danmark A/S.
• Staat der Nederlanden v Essent NV (C‑105/12), Essent Nederland BV (C‑105/12), Eneco Holding NV (C‑106/12) and Delta NV (C‑107/12).
• Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities.
• República Italiana contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
• De Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community.
• Reino de España contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
• Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities.
• Association Vent De Colère! Fédération nationale and Others v Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie.
• Wolfgang Heiser v Finanzamt Innsbruck.
• Kingdom of Belgium (C-182/03) and Forum 187 ASBL (C-217/03) v Commission of the European Communities.
• British Aggregates Association v Commission of the European Communities and United Kingdom.
• European Commission v World Duty Free Group SA and Others.
• Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities.
• República Francesa contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
• Firma Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts AG contra Seebetriebsrat Bodo Ziesemer der Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts AG.
• Doux Élevage SNC and Coopérative agricole UKL-ARREE v Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Alimentation, de la Pêche, de la Ruralité et de l’Aménagement du territoire and Comité interprofessionnel de la dinde française (CIDEF).
• Reino de Bélgica contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
• PreussenElektra AG v Schhleswag AG, in the presence of Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH and Land Schleswig-Holstein.
• European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.
• República Italiana contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
• Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht.
• ENEA S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki.