Chan Heng Wah v Peh Thiam Choh

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Chan Heng Wah and Another v Peh Thiam Choh and Another

DISTINGUISHES

• Lai Chi Kay and Others v Lee Kuo Shin

REVERSES

• Chan Heng Wah and Another v Peh Thiam Choh and Another

REFERS TO

• Ban Pet Hock v Ong Ah Ho
• Pickett v British Rail Engineering Ltd
• Gammell v Wilson

FOLLOWS

• Harris v Empress Motors Ltd
• Low Kok Tong v Teo Chan Pan
• Adsett v West

[See more]

• Gammell v Wilson
• Harris v Empress Motors Ltd
• Lai Wee Lian v Singapore Bus Services (1978) Ltd
• White v London Transport Executive

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Noorianti bte Zainol Abidin and Others v Tang Lei Nge

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1987] SGCA 14
• [1987] SLR 132

FOLLOWED in

• Jeya and Others v Lui Yew Kee
• Peh Diana and Another v Tan Miang Lee
• Toon Chee Meng Eddie v Yeap Chin Hon

[See more]

• Lee Wee Hiong & Another (administrators of the estate of Lee Liak Meng (deceased)) and Others v Koh Ah Sai Victor and Others
• Low Yoke Ying and Another v Sim Kok Lee and Others

REFERRED in

• Lee Ngiap Hoon v Teo Sin
• Ho Yeow Kim v Lai Hai Kuen and Another

This document cites

• Gammell v Wilson
• Pickett v British Rail Engineering Ltd
• Harris v Empress Motors Ltd
• Gammell v Wilson
• Lai Wee Lian v Singapore Bus Services (1978) Ltd



See all quotations

• Harris v Empress Motors Ltd
• White v London Transport Executive
• Adsett v West
• Chan Heng Wah and Another v Peh Thiam Choh and Another
• Lai Chi Kay and Others v Lee Kuo Shin
• Low Kok Tong v Teo Chan Pan
• Ban Pet Hock v Ong Ah Ho
• Central Provident Fund Act 1953