Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022. Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Primacy of EU law – Lack of jurisdiction of a national court to examine the conformity with EU law of national legislation found to be constitutional by the constitutional court of the Member State concerned – Disciplinary proceedings.#Case C-430/21.
Linked as:
Extract
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022. Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Primacy of EU law – Lack of jurisdiction of a national court to examine the conformity with EU law of national legislation found to be constitutional by the constitutional court of the Member State concerned – Disciplinary proceedings.#Case C-430/21.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
- Heinrich Weiss and Others v Bundesregierung and Others.
- Winner Wetten GmbH v Bürgermeisterin der Stadt Bergheim.
- Andy Wightman y otros contra Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.
- Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel.
