Application of Dragan Cvetkovic pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Cvetkovic, Dragan v R
• Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus
• Cvetkovic v R

[See more]

• Muldrock v The Queen
• R v Porter
• Zreika v R
• Richard Pannel port action de dett v Thomas Nevel Chevalier, que fuit lie en
• Eastman v DPP (Act)
• Aldous v R
• R v way
• Frank Sinkovich v The Honourable Justice Megan Latham
• Repleg. per Richard Holt v Will. Roper le Case fuit que I. Abbe de Westm
• Kentwell v R
• Pfitzner v R
• R v McNaughten

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2016] NSWSC 260

CONSIDERED in

• Roger Cheney(Applicant) v Attorney General for the State of NSW
• Dragan Cvetkovic(Applicant) v Attorney-General of New South Wales
• Application of Armand-Iskak pursuant to s 78 Crime (Appeal and Review) Act 2001

[See more]

• Application by Sef Gonzales pursuant to s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) (No 2)
• Application of Doyle under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001

This document cites

• R v Suey
• Eastman v DPP (Act)
• Muldrock v The Queen
• Cvetkovic v R
• Zreika v R



See all quotations

• Cvetkovic, Dragan v R
• Ivan Robert Marko Milat v R
• Frank Sinkovich v The Honourable Justice Megan Latham
• Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• Pfitzner v R
• R v way
• Aldous v R
• Kentwell v R
• Application by Frank Sinkovich pursuant to s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• R v McNaughten
• Repleg. per Richard Holt v Will. Roper le Case fuit que I. Abbe de Westm
• R v Porter
• Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus
• Richard Pannel port action de dett v Thomas Nevel Chevalier, que fuit lie en