Application of Doyle under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Australia Act 1986

CONSIDERS

• R v ED
• R v Doyle

[See more]

• R v Duncan Sak Cheung Lam, Ting Man Ngai & Tin Fong So (aka Man Kwan Lam)
• Application of Doyle
• Frank Sinkovich v The Honourable Justice Megan Latham
• Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• Matthew Soames(Applicant) v Attorney-General in and for the State of New South Wales
• Richard William Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales
• R v Suey
• Appn of Robert Joseph Dunn
• Application of Armand-Iskak pursuant to s 78 Crime (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• R v Ivan Robert Marko Milat
• Application of Dragan Cvetkovic pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• R v Gregory
• Viro v R

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2019] NSWSC 1029

CONSIDERED in

• Huynh v Attorney General (NSW)

This document cites

• R v Suey
• R v Ivan Robert Marko Milat
• R v Gregory
• Matthew Soames(Applicant) v Attorney-General in and for the State of New South Wales
• Application of Dragan Cvetkovic pursuant to Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001



See all quotations

• R v ED
• Application of Armand-Iskak pursuant to s 78 Crime (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• Richard William Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales
• Frank Sinkovich v The Honourable Justice Megan Latham
• Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• R v Doyle
• R v Duncan Sak Cheung Lam, Ting Man Ngai & Tin Fong So (aka Man Kwan Lam)
• Appn of Robert Joseph Dunn
• Application of Doyle
• Viro v R
• Australia Act 1986