91 Cal.App.3d 567, 54072, Durham v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 91 Cal.App.3d 567, 154 Cal.Rptr. 243

Opinion Judge: [10] Beach

Party Name: Durham v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] C. C. Headley for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Burt Pines, City Attorney, John T. Neville, Assistant City Attorney, Daniel U. Smith, Deputy City Attorney, Morris & Polich, Landon Morris, John K. Morris, Robert S. Wolfe, Albert & Schmiege and Merrill K. Albert for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: March 09, 1979

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

91 Cal.App.3d 567, 54072, Durham v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 32 Cal.2d 378, 19311, County of L. A. v. Southern Cal. Tel. Co.
California - 59 Cal.2d 668, 27158, Meyer v. Blackman
California - 68 Cal.2d 245, 29475, Van Arsdale v. Hollinger
California - 69 Cal.2d 108, 22583, Rowland v. Christian
California - 11 Cal.3d 1, 7976, D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners

See all quotations