68 Cal.2d 245, 29475, Van Arsdale v. Hollinger

Citation: 68 Cal.2d 245, 66 Cal.Rptr. 20, 437 P.2d 508

Opinion Judge: [11] Peters

Party Name: Van Arsdale v. Hollinger

Attorney: [7] Action to recover for personal injuries. Judgment reversed as to defendant city and affirmed as to other defendant. [8] Rose, Klein & Marias and Robert B. Steinberg for Plaintiff and Appellant. [9] Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Victor P. Spero, Deputy City Attorney, Murchison, Cumming, Bake...

Case Date: Wednesday February 21, 1968

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

68 Cal.2d 245, 29475, Van Arsdale v. Hollinger

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 195 F.2d 815 (3rd Cir. 1952), 10478, United States ex rel. Almeida v. Baldi
Federal Cases - 184 F.2d 962 (9th Cir. 1950), 12258, Stauffer v. Exley
Federal Cases - 337 U.S. 78 (1949), 269, United States v. National City Lines, Inc.
California - 37 Cal.2d 522, 21805, Tossman v. Newman
California - 44 Cal.2d 225, 23300, Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.

See all quotations