853 P.2d 908 (Wash. 1993), 59306-0, Van Hout v. Celotex Corp.

Citation: 853 P.2d 908, 121 Wn.2d 697

Opinion Judge: MADSEN

Party Name: William VAN HOUT, Petitioner, v. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, successor in interest to Philip Carey Manufacturing Co., Respondent.

Attorney: Edwards, Sieh, Wiggins & Hathaway, Charles K. Wiggins, Levinson, Friedman, Vhugen, Duggan & Bland, Linda J. Dunn, Joel J. Delman, and Theodore R. Willhite, Seattle, for petitioner. Hillis, Clark, Martin & Peterson, P.S., Laurie Lootens Chyz, Lynne M. Cohee, Seattle, for respondent.

Judge Panel: UTTER, BRACHTENBACH, DURHAM, SMITH, GUY and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Case Date: June 17, 1993

Court: Washington Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

853 P.2d 908 (Wash. 1993), 59306-0, Van Hout v. Celotex Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 899 F.2d 1281 (2nd Cir. 1990), 341, Johnson v. Celotex Corp.
Federal Cases - 944 F.2d 69 (2nd Cir. 1991), 291, O'Brien v. National Gypsum Co.
Washington - 383 P.2d 283 (Wash. 1963), 36596, Roumel v. Fude
Washington - 521 P.2d 929 (Wash. 1974), 42946, Galvan v. Prosser Packers, Inc.
Washington - 533 P.2d 383 (Wash. 1975), 43091, Nelson v. Mueller

See all quotations