744 P.2d 605 (Wash. 1987), 53061-1, Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc.

Citation: 744 P.2d 605, 109 Wn.2d 235

Opinion Judge: DURHAM

Party Name: (CCH) P 11,579 Albert LOCKWOOD and Dorothy Anna Lockwood, husband and wife, Respondents, v. AC & S, INC., et al., Defendants, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Respondent, Raymark Industries, Inc., successor in business to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Petitioner.

Attorney: Karr, Tuttle, Koch, Campbell, Mawer, Morrow & Sax, P.S., John J. Soltys, Allen R. Sakai, Philip A. Talmadge, Seattle, for petitioner. Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender, P.S., William S. Bailey, Seattle, for respondents.

Judge Panel: PEARSON, C.J., and UTTER, DORE, DOLLIVER, ANDERSEN, CALLOW, GOODLOE and BRACHTENBACH, JJ., concur.

Case Date: Thursday October 15, 1987

Court: Washington Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

744 P.2d 605 (Wash. 1987), 53061-1, Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 776 F.2d 1492 (11th Cir. 1985), 82-8548, Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
Federal Cases - 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986), 84-1323, Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
Federal Cases - 776 F.2d 1565 (6th Cir. 1985), 82-5393, Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
Federal Cases - 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1981), 80-1820, United States v. Bagnariol
Federal Cases - 783 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir. 1986), 84-4380, Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp.

See all quotations