76 Cal.App.4th 1428, D030732, Riverwatch v. County of San Diego

Citation: 76 Cal.App.4th 1428, 91 Cal.Rptr.2d 322

Opinion Judge: [9] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Benke, Acting P.J.

Party Name: Riverwatch v. County of San Diego

Attorney: [8] R. Mark Beesley, County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant. Hall & Associates, Carlyle W. Hall, Jr., Andrew Henderson and Bethany A. Dreyfus for Plaintiffs and Respondents. Remy, Thomas and Moose, Tina A. Thomas, Andrea M. Klein and Katherine Currie Pittard; Schwartz, Heidel & Prairie, Will...

Case Date: December 22, 1999

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

76 Cal.App.4th 1428, D030732, Riverwatch v. County of San Diego

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 42 Cal.3d 929, 32144, Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 3 Dist. Agricultural Assn.
California - 47 Cal.3d 376, S001922, Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California
California - 16 Cal.4th 1040, S048396, Bickel v. City of Piedmont
California - 131 Cal.App.3d 350, 19741, Environmental Planning & Information Council v. County of El Dorado
California - 176 Cal.App.3d 202, E000818, City of Redlands v. Sorensen

See all quotations