26 Cal.App.4th 1307, A060989, Bloom v. McGurk

Citation: 26 Cal.App.4th 1307, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 914

Opinion Judge: [11] Perley

Party Name: Bloom v. McGurk

Attorney: [7] Steve Bloom, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Charles G. Holland III, Assistant Attorney General, Stephanie Wald and Elizabeth Edwards, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent. [9] Graham & James, Jennifer Hernandez and Michael...

Case Date: July 21, 1994

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

26 Cal.App.4th 1307, A060989, Bloom v. McGurk

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 50 Cal.3d 370, S007919, Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities Com.
California - 8 Cal.3d 247, 7924, Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors
California - 115 Cal.App.3d 827, 47393, Dehne v. County of Santa Clara
California - 131 Cal.App.3d 350, 19741, Environmental Planning & Information Council v. County of El Dorado
California - 165 Cal.App.3d 823, 21496, Lewis v. Seventheenth Dist. Agricultural Assn.

See all quotations