719 A.2d 119 (Md. 1998), 74, Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 25 F.2d 498 (D.Md. 1928), 5053, In re Hook
• Federal Cases - 728 F.Supp. 1533 (S.D.Fla. 1989), 89-771, American Dog Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Dade County, Fla.
• Federal Cases - 628 F.Supp. 196 (E.D.Pa. 1986), Civ. A. 86-0865, Starkey v. Chester Tp.
• Federal Cases - 828 F.Supp. 1168 (M.D.Pa. 1993), 4CV-92-1426, Gallick v. Barto
• Federal Cases - 493 U.S. 976 (1989), 89-447, Pence v. Board of County Com'rs of Hamilton County, Ohio



See all quotations

• Alaska - 720 P.2d 945 (Alaska 1986), S-928, Alaskan Village, Inc. v. Smalley, for and on Behalf of Smalley
• Arkansas - 817 S.W.2d 208 (Ark. 1991), 90-352, Holt v. City of Maumelle
• Arkansas - 908 S.W.2d 338 (Ark. 1995), 95-103, Bryant v. Putnam
• Arizona - 770 P.2d 377 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1988), 2 CA-CV 88-0249, Gibbons v. Chavez
• California - 44 Cal.App.3d 504, 1936, Uccello v. Laudenslayer
• Colorado - 820 P.2d 644 (Colo. 1991), 90SA342, Colorado Dog Fanciers, Inc. v. City and County of Denver By and Through City Council
• Hawaii - 642 P.2d 542 (Hawai'i App. 1982), 8002, Fernandez v. Marks
• Florida - 423 So.2d 616 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1982), AM-64, Allen v. Enslow
• Florida - 468 So.2d 291 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 1985), BC-319, Anderson v. Walthal
• Florida - 504 So.2d 528 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1987), 86-1443, Ward v. Young
• Florida - 509 So.2d 1241 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1987), 85-1968, Vasques By and Through Rocha v. Lopez
• Florida - 534 So.2d 760 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1988), 87-652, State v. Peters
• Georgia - 336 S.E.2d 287 (Ga.App. 1985), 70452, Lidster v. Jones
• Georgia - 341 S.E.2d 8 (Ga. 1986), 42869, Pine Terrace Associates Ltd. v. Lidster
• Iowa - 469 N.W.2d 416 (Iowa 1991), 89-1725, American Dog Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Des Moines
• Iowa - 545 N.W.2d 281 (Iowa 1996), 94-1929, Allison by Fox v. Page
• Florida - 584 So.2d 187 (Fla.App. 5 Dist. 1991), 89-2360, Giaculli v. Bright
• Indiana - 558 N.E.2d 853 (Ind.App. 3 Dist. 1990), 39A01-9002-CV-83, Goddard by Goddard v. Weaver
• Illinois - 522 N.E.2d 736 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1988), 86-2194, Lucas v. Kriska
• Kansas - 772 P.2d 758 (Kan. 1989), 62045, Hearn v. City of Overland Park
• Kentucky - 447 S.W.2d 84 (Ky. 1969), McDonald v. Talbott
• Maryland - 161 A. 172 (Md. 1932), 43, Marshall v. Price
• Maryland - 165 A. 182 (Md. 1933), 22, Bowman v. Williams
• Maryland - 169 A. 311 (Md. 1933), 36, State, to Use of Schiller v. Hecht Co.
• Maryland - 191 A. 575 (Md. 1937), 9, Mahan v. State, to Use of Carr
• Maryland - 44 A. 1031 (Md. 1899), Morrison v. Smith
• Maryland - 48 A. 92 (Md. 1901), Smith v. State
• Maryland - 73 A. 688 (Md. 1909), Green v. T.A. Shoemaker & Co.
• Maryland - 73 A. 891 (Md. 1909), Miller v. Fisher
• Maryland - 105 A.2d 207 (Md. 1954), 136, Sherwood Bros. v. Eckard