44 Cal.App.3d 504, 1936, Uccello v. Laudenslayer

Citation: 44 Cal.App.3d 504, 118 Cal.Rptr. 741

Opinion Judge: [10] Franson

Party Name: Uccello v. Laudenslayer

Attorney: [7] Damrell & Damrell and Duane L. Nelson for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Price, Martin & Crabtree and Walter J. Schmidt for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday January 14, 1975

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

44 Cal.App.3d 504, 1936, Uccello v. Laudenslayer

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 169 Cal. 33, S. F. 6485, Bias v. Reed
California - 27 Cal.2d 449, 19384, Burroughs v. Ben's Auto Park, Inc.
California - 28 Cal.2d 394, 19496, Johnston v. De La Guerra Properties, Inc.
California - 69 Cal.2d 108, 22583, Rowland v. Christian
California - 110 Cal.App. 16, Civ. 229, Dennis v. City of Orange

See all quotations