600 A.2d 13 (Conn.App. 1991), 9967, Homart Development Co. v. Planning and Zoning Com'n of Town of Watertown

Citation: 600 A.2d 13, 26 Conn.App. 212

Opinion Judge: CRETELLA, J.

Party Name: HOMART DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF WATERTOWN et al.

Attorney: Karen P. Blado, with whom, on the brief, was Alyce L. Raboy, Hartford, for appellant (plaintiff)., Thomas P. Byrne, Farmington, for appellees (defendants). Karen P. Blado, with whom, on the brief, was Alyce L. Raboy, for the appellant (plaintiff). Thomas P. Byrne, for the appellees (defendants).

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before LAVERY, LANDAU and CRETELLA

Case Date: December 10, 1991

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

600 A.2d 13 (Conn.App. 1991), 9967, Homart Development Co. v. Planning and Zoning Com'n of Town of Watertown

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 20 A. 666 (Conn. 1890), Whitney v. City of New Haven
Connecticut - 216 A.2d 193 (Conn. 1965), McAdam v. Sheldon
Connecticut - 230 A.2d 606 (Conn. 1967), Malafronte v. Planning and Zoning Bd. of City of Milford
Connecticut - 254 A.2d 914 (Conn. 1969), Jablon v. Town Planning & Zoning Commission of Town of Newtown
Connecticut - 256 A.2d 685 (Conn. 1969), Cascio v. Town Council of Town of West Hartford

See all quotations