589 A.2d 3 (Conn.App. 1991), 9276, Fenn v. Planning and Zoning Com'n of Town of Seymour

Citation: 589 A.2d 3, 24 Conn.App. 430

Opinion Judge: NORCOTT, J.

Party Name: Edward FENN v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF SEYMOUR.

Attorney: Richard P. Gilardi, Stratford, with whom was Richard S. Bruchal, Town Atty., for appellants (named defendant et al.)., Joseph E. Sakal, Seymour, for appellee (plaintiff). Richard P. Gilardi, with whom was Richard S. Bruchal, town attorney, for the appellants (named defendant et al.). Joseph E. S...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before DALY, NORCOTT and FOTI

Case Date: April 16, 1991

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

589 A.2d 3 (Conn.App. 1991), 9276, Fenn v. Planning and Zoning Com'n of Town of Seymour

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 167 A.2d 706 (Conn. 1961), Kimball v. Court of Common Council of City of Meriden
Connecticut - 268 A.2d 395 (Conn. 1970), Stiles v. Town Council of Town of West Hartford
Connecticut - 282 A.2d 894 (Conn. 1971), Loh v. Town Plan and Zoning Commission of Town of Fairfield
Connecticut - 292 A.2d 893 (Conn. 1972), Morningside Ass'n v. Planning and Zoning Bd. of City of Milford
Connecticut - 362 A.2d 785 (Conn. 1975), City of New Haven v. United Illuminating Co., Inc.

See all quotations