600 A.2d 1040 (Conn.App. 1991), 10029, Cummings and Lockwood v. Gray

Citation: 600 A.2d 1040, 26 Conn.App. 293

Opinion Judge: HEIMAN, J.

Party Name: CUMMINGS AND LOCKWOOD v. Richard E. GRAY et al.

Attorney: F. Timothy McNamara, Hartford, for appellants (defendants)., Charles F. Brower, Torrington, for appellee (plaintiff). F. Timothy McNamara, for the appellants (defendants). Charles F. Brower, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before LAVERY, LANDAU and HEIMAN

Case Date: Tuesday December 24, 1991

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

600 A.2d 1040 (Conn.App. 1991), 10029, Cummings and Lockwood v. Gray

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 260 A.2d 596 (Conn. 1969), United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission of City of Stamford
Connecticut - 392 A.2d 468 (Conn. 1978), Morris v. Costa
Connecticut - 429 A.2d 908 (Conn. 1980), D. H. R. Const. Co., Inc. v. Donnelly
Connecticut - 430 A.2d 25 (Conn. 1980), A & H Corp. v. City of Bridgeport
Connecticut - 438 A.2d 415 (Conn. 1980), Farrell v. Farrell

See all quotations