591 A.2d 453 (Conn.App. 1991), 9274, Burke v. Ruggerio

Citation: 591 A.2d 453, 24 Conn.App. 700

Opinion Judge: HEIMAN, J.

Party Name: Charles A. BURKE v. Joseph R. RUGGERIO et al. Roland A. PEPIN et al. v. Charles A. BURKE [1].

Attorney: Robert F. Cohen, Bristol, for appellant (plaintiff in the first case, defendant in the second case)., David A. Zipfel, East Hartford, for appellees (named defendant et al. in the first case, plaintiffs in the second case)., Dennis C. LaGanza, for appellees (defendant Ralph A. Pasek et al. in the ...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before SPALLONE, FOTI and HEIMAN

Case Date: May 28, 1991

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

591 A.2d 453 (Conn.App. 1991), 9274, Burke v. Ruggerio

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 74 A. 908 (Conn. 1909), Seery v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut - 86 A. 668 (Conn. 1913), Goodwin v. Bragaw
Connecticut - 166 A.2d 150 (Conn. 1960), Loewenberg v. Wallace
Connecticut - 199 A.2d 164 (Conn. 1964), Triano v. Brodowy
Connecticut - 231 A.2d 527 (Conn. 1967), Marquis v. Drost

See all quotations