504 A.2d 29 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1986), Ball v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

Citation: 504 A.2d 29, 207 N.J.Super. 100

Opinion Judge: [13] Baime

Party Name: George E. BALL, Administrator, and Administrator Ad Prosequendum of Estate of Mark Ball, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Township of Berkeley, County of Ocean and State of New Jersey, Department of Law and Public Safety, Defendants-Respondents, and Reid Construction Company and A.B.C. Corporation (a fictitious name, actua

Attorney: [7] Noel S. Tonneman argued the cause for appellant (Auerbach, Rudnick, Waldman, Ford, Addonizio & Pappa, attorneys; Martin M. Rudnick, of counsel; Noel S. Tonneman, on the brief).

Case Date: January 09, 1986

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

504 A.2d 29 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1986), Ball v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 472 F.2d 88 (3rd Cir. 1973), 71-1849, Hassan v. Stafford
Federal Cases - 363 F.2d 973 (D.C. Cir. 1966), 19428, Curtis v. District of Columbia
California - 91 Cal.App.3d 426, 54033, Hill v. People ex rel. Dept. of Transportation
New Jersey - 137 A.2d 41 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1957), No. A--702, Morie v. New Jersey Manufacturers Indemnity Insurance Co.
New Jersey - 140 A.2d 199 (N.J. 1958), A-82, Michaels v. Brookchester, Inc.

See all quotations