380 A.2d 1137 (N.J.Super.L. 1977), Danow v. Penn Central Transp. Co.

Citation: 380 A.2d 1137, 153 N.J.Super. 597

Opinion Judge: [13] Furman

Party Name: Ruth DANOW, Administratrix and Administratrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Robert Danow, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Richard C. Sinansky, Quigley Company, County of Middlesex, State of New Jersey, Department of Transportation and thePublic Utilities Commission, Defendants.

Attorney: [6] Messrs. Heilbrunn, Finkelstein, Heilbrunn, Garruto and Galex, attorneys for plaintiffs (Mr. Robert E. Goldstein on the brief).

Case Date: Monday October 24, 1977

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

380 A.2d 1137 (N.J.Super.L. 1977), Danow v. Penn Central Transp. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 260 Cal.App.2d 378, 24370, Holmes v. City of Oakland
California - 7 Cal.App.3d 826, 12325, Low v. City of Sacramento
New Jersey - 124 A. 520 (N.J. 1924), 244, City of Bridgeton v. Zellers
New Jersey - 246 A.2d 442 (N.J. 1968), A--11, Bergen v. Koppenal
New Jersey - 264 A.2d 34 (N.J. 1970), Willis v. Department of Conservation and Economic Development

See all quotations