403 S.E.2d 122 (S.C. 1991), 23373, Noisette v. Ismail

Citation: 403 S.E.2d 122, 304 S.C. 56

Opinion Judge: FINNEY, Justice:

Party Name: Lurline NOISETTE, Respondent, v. Bassem ISMAIL, B.G. Owens d/b/a Auto Refurbishing, Penn National Insurance Company, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants, of whom Penn National Insurance Company is, Petitioner, and B.G. Owens d/b/a Auto Refurbishing is, Respondent.

Attorney: Stephen E. Darling and Bert G. Utsey, III, Sinkler & Boyd, P.A., Charleston, for petitioner. Peggy Chandler, Belk, Cobb & Chandler, Charleston, for respondent B.G. Owens d/b/a Auto Refurbishing. Arnold S. Goodstein and Mary A. Marwick, Goodstein & Goodstein, Summerville, for respondent Lurline No...

Case Date: April 01, 1991

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

403 S.E.2d 122 (S.C. 1991), 23373, Noisette v. Ismail

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 7 S.E. 489 (S.C. 1888), May v. Cavender
South Carolina - 355 S.E.2d 541 (S.C.App. 1986), 0944, Pawley's Island Civic Ass'n v. Johnson
South Carolina - 372 S.E.2d 99 (S.C.App. 1988), 1148, Borg Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Darby
South Carolina - 384 S.E.2d 310 (S.C.App. 1989), 1365, Noisette v. Ismail
South Carolina - 394 S.E.2d 7 (S.C.App. 1990), 1508, Halbersberg v. Berry