394 S.E.2d 7 (S.C.App. 1990), 1508, Halbersberg v. Berry

Citation: 394 S.E.2d 7, 302 S.C. 97

Opinion Judge: CURETON, Judge:

Party Name: David HALBERSBERG, Respondent, v. William BERRY, Catherine M. Berry and Fun Fashions, Inc., Appellants. David HALBERSBERG, Respondent, v. William BERRY, Appellant.

Attorney: John P. Henry and Emma Ruth Brittain of Thompson, Henry, Gwin, Brittain & Stevens, Conway, for appellants. Howell V. Bellamny, Jr., and Preston B. Haines, III of Bellamy, Rutenberg, Copeland, Epps, Gravely & Bowers, Myrtle Beach, for respondent.

Case Date: May 29, 1990

Court: South Carolina Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

394 S.E.2d 7 (S.C.App. 1990), 1508, Halbersberg v. Berry

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 200 F.2d 659 (4th Cir. 1952), 6509, United States v. 5139.5 Acres of Land, in Aiken and Barnwell Counties, S. C., Tract No. D-308
South Carolina - 207 S.E.2d 82 (S.C. 1974), 19859, Terry v. Brashier
South Carolina - 232 S.E.2d 20 (S.C. 1977), 20347, Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Development Corp.
South Carolina - 312 S.E.2d 579 (S.C.App. 1984), 0066, Buffkin v. Strickland
South Carolina - 313 S.E.2d 45 (S.C.App. 1984), 0087, South Carolina Dept. of Social Services v. Bacot

See all quotations