4 Cal.App.3d 1004, 12168, Sacramento-Yolo Port Dist. v. Cargill of California, Inc.

Citation: 4 Cal.App.3d 1004, 84 Cal.Rptr. 822

Opinion Judge: [10] Pierce

Party Name: Sacramento-Yolo Port Dist. v. Cargill of California, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Chickering & Gregory, John Philip Coghlan, Harry A. Jackson, Jr., and Leslie P. Jay for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Fitzwilliam, Memering, Stumbos & DeMers and Robert Memering for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Monday March 02, 1970

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

4 Cal.App.3d 1004, 12168, Sacramento-Yolo Port Dist. v. Cargill of California, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 184 F.2d 359 (8th Cir. 1950), 14087, General Mills v. Goldman, Ind. Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind., Intervener
California - 207 Cal. 498, L. A. 9983, Morris v. Warner
California - 20 Cal.2d 751, 15988, Universal Sales Corp. v. Cal. Etc. Mfg. Co.
California - 52 Cal.2d 411, 25377, Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.
California - 54 Cal.2d 744, 20451, Crestview Cemetery Ass'n v. Dieden

See all quotations