382 S.E.2d 900 (S.C. 1989), 23054, Thompson v. Hammond

Citation: 382 S.E.2d 900, 299 S.C. 116

Opinion Judge: TOAL, Justice:

Party Name: Sidney THOMPSON, Respondent, v. F.C. HAMMOND, Horry County, John Doe, and Any Other Persons Claiming an Interest Defendants, of whom Horry County and John Doe are Petitioners.

Attorney: James B. Van Osdell and Cynthia Graham Howe, of Van Osdell, Lester, Stewart, McCutchen & Brittain, P.A., Myrtle Beach, for petitioners. John P. Henry and Emma Ruth Brittain, Conway, for respondent.

Case Date: July 31, 1989

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

382 S.E.2d 900 (S.C. 1989), 23054, Thompson v. Hammond

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 158 S.E. 409 (S.C. 1931), 13128, Ralph v. Southern Ry. Co.
South Carolina - 196 S.E.2d 122 (S.C. 1973), 19613, McInerny v. Toler
South Carolina - 224 S.E.2d 713 (S.C. 1976), 20212, Hodges v. Fanning
South Carolina - 230 S.E.2d 900 (S.C. 1976), 20328, Ledford v. Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co.
South Carolina - 248 S.E.2d 594 (S.C. 1978), 20804, Graham v. Town of Loris

See all quotations