224 S.E.2d 713 (S.C. 1976), 20212, Hodges v. Fanning

Citation: 224 S.E.2d 713, 266 S.C. 517

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam:

Party Name: Ray C. HODGES, Respondent, v. William S. FANNING and Birobal Corp., Appellants. Carolyn B. HODGES, Respondent, v. William S. FANNING and Birobal Corp., Appellants.

Attorney: Messrs. Grimball & Cabaniss, and Malcolm M. Crosland, of Charleston, for Appellants, cite: As to the Court's having erred in refusing to set aside the Order of Default on the ground that there was no mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, when Appellants turned Complaints over to ...

Case Date: Tuesday May 04, 1976

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

224 S.E.2d 713 (S.C. 1976), 20212, Hodges v. Fanning

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 196 S.E.2d 122 (S.C. 1973), 19613, McInerny v. Toler
South Carolina - 222 S.E.2d 282 (S.C. 1976), 20165, Evans v. Fiat-Roosevelt Motors, Inc.
South Carolina - 5 S.E.2d 729 (S.C. 1939), 14970, Poston v. State Highway Dept.
South Carolina - 99 S.E.2d 391 (S.C. 1957), 17330, Simon v. Flowers