27 Cal.App.4th 1611, B071678, Schultz v. Harney

Citation: 27 Cal.App.4th 1611, 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 276

Opinion Judge: [10] Croskey

Party Name: Schultz v. Harney

Attorney: [7] Harry Frank Scolinos for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] David M. Harney, in pro. per., Thomas Kallay, Vincent McGowan, Esner, Marylander, Zakheim & Higa, Stuart B. Esner and Rosalyn S. Zakheim for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: September 01, 1994

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

27 Cal.App.4th 1611, B071678, Schultz v. Harney

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 171 Cal. 273, S. F. 6762, Pike v. Zadig
California - 14 Cal.2d 47, 16709, Goddard v. Security Title Ins. & Guar. Co.
California - 19 Cal.2d 807, 18057, Bernhard v. Bank of America
California - 32 Cal.2d 23, 17343, Greenfield v. Mather
California - 44 Cal.2d 715, 23261, Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. McConnell

See all quotations