229 Cal.App.3d 583, B045427, Yates v. Law offices of Samuel Shore

Citation: 229 Cal.App.3d 583, 280 Cal.Rptr. 316

Opinion Judge: [11] Fukuto

Party Name: Yates v. Law offices of Samuel Shore

Attorney: [7] Samuel Shore, in pro. per., and James R. McGrath for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Sullivan & Bottom and Philip G. Dorn for Plaintiffs and Respondents. [9] Horvitz & Levy, David S. Ettinger and S. Thomas Todd as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: April 22, 1991

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

229 Cal.App.3d 583, B045427, Yates v. Law offices of Samuel Shore

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 37 Cal.3d 920, 24435, Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc.
California - 41 Cal.3d 883, 24775, Young v. Haines
California - 43 Cal.3d 1379, 32145, Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Com.
California - 148 Cal.App.3d 512, 24595, Canavin v. Pacific Southwest Airlines
California - 186 Cal.App.3d 1247, B015313, Hathaway v. Baldwin Park Community Hospital

See all quotations