231 Cal.App.2d 756, 21635, Mullins v. Toothman

Citation: 231 Cal.App.2d 756, 42 Cal.Rptr. 254

Opinion Judge: [10] Devine

Party Name: Mullins v. Toothman

Attorney: [7] Hilton J. Melby, City Attorney (Oakland), and Mark B. Shragge, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Carroll, Davis, Burdick & McDonough for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: January 21, 1965

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

231 Cal.App.2d 756, 21635, Mullins v. Toothman

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 124 Cal. 61, S. F. 764, Buck v. City of Eureka
California - 40 Cal.2d 583, 6280, Martin v. Henderson
California - 41 Cal.2d 334, 22775, Lorenson v. City of Los Angeles
California - 125 Cal.App.2d 378, 15772, Pootel v. City & County of S. F.
California - 205 Cal.App.2d 304, 25725, Welshans v. City of Santa Barbara