125 Cal.App.2d 378, 15772, Pootel v. City & County of S. F.

Citation: 125 Cal.App.2d 378, 270 P.2d 553

Opinion Judge: [10] Gibson

Party Name: Pootel v. City & County of S. F.

Attorney: [7] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Bernard J. Ward, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellants. [8] Molly H. Minudri and Manuel L. Furtado for Respondent.

Case Date: May 20, 1954

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

125 Cal.App.2d 378, 15772, Pootel v. City & County of S. F.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 40 Cal.2d 583, 6280, Martin v. Henderson
California - 42 Cal.2d 602, 6282, Treu v. Kirkwood
California - 59 Cal.App.2d 458, 12017, Viner v. Civil Service Com.
California - 6 Cal.App.2d 633, 9594, Bruce v. Civil Service Board

125 Cal.App.2d 378, 15772, Pootel v. City &amp; County of S. F.

125 Cal.App.2d 378, 15772, Pootel v. City & County of S. F.