224 Cal.App.3d 1559, D010796, Hohe v. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist.

Citation: 224 Cal.App.3d 1559, 274 Cal.Rptr. 647

Opinion Judge: [11] Lim

Party Name: Hohe v. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist.

Attorney: [7] Robert P. Irwin for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Peter L. Garchie and Philip A. Book for Defendant and Appellant. [9] McInnis, Fitzgerald, Rees, Sharkey & McIntyre and Steven J. Cologne for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday November 08, 1990

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

224 Cal.App.3d 1559, D010796, Hohe v. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 18 Cal.2d 409, 17462, Seeger v. Odell
California - 52 Cal.2d 411, 25377, Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.
California - 54 Cal.2d 445, 25375, Harvey Mach. Co. v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.
California - 60 Cal.2d 92, 26984, Tunkl v. Regents of University of Cal.
California - 62 Cal.2d 412, 28136, Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

See all quotations