217 S.E.2d 135 (S.C. 1975), 20047, Almers v. South Carolina Nat. Bank of Charleston.

Citation: 217 S.E.2d 135, 265 S.C. 48

Opinion Judge: NESS, Justice:

Party Name: Herbert J. ALMERS, Jr., Appellant, v. The SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK OF CHARLESTON, a corporation, et al., Respondents.

Attorney: Messrs. Dobson & Dobson, of Greenville, for Appellant, cite: As to the noncompetition forfeiture provision contained in the South Carolina National Bank Employees' profit Sharing Plan not being valid and enforceable under the laws of the State of South Carolina: Law Note, II S. C. L. Q., 343; 239...

Case Date: June 26, 1975

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

217 S.E.2d 135 (S.C. 1975), 20047, Almers v. South Carolina Nat. Bank of Charleston.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 450 F.2d 118 (4th Cir. 1971), 15408, Rochester Corp. v. Rochester
California - 62 Cal.2d 239, 27435, Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.
Florida - 245 So.2d 854 (Fla. 1971), 38827, Flammer v. Patton
Georgia - 167 S.E.2d 693 (Ga.App. 1969), 43904, Brown Stove Works, Inc. v. Kimsey
Iowa - 200 N.W.2d 504 (Iowa 1972), 55046, Van Hosen v. Bankers Trust Co.

See all quotations