122 S.E.2d 559 (S.C. 1961), 17841, Oxman v. Sherman

Citation: 122 S.E.2d 559, 239 S.C. 218

Opinion Judge: OXNER, Justice.

Party Name: Maxwell OXMAN, Roy Markus, Eva Markus, Hy Garfinkel and J. E. Koolkin d/b/a South Carolina Agency, a partnership, and United Insurance Company of America, Respondents, v. Victor SHERMAN, Appellant.

Attorney: Messrs. McLain & Sherill and Robert P. Wilkins, of Columbia, for Appellant, cite: As to the territorial restriction in the covenant not to compete being so large and extensive that it covers a larger area that necessary to protect plaintiffs' legitimate business interests: 30 S.C. 412, 9 S.E. 422...

Case Date: October 30, 1961

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

122 S.E.2d 559 (S.C. 1961), 17841, Oxman v. Sherman

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 105 N.E.2d 685 (Ohio Comm. 1952), 617926, Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland v. Witter
South Carolina - 1 S.E.2d 162 (S.C. 1939), 14812, Chitwood v. McMillan
South Carolina - 103 S.E.2d 521 (S.C. 1958), 17425, Turbeville v. Gordon
South Carolina - 104 S.E.2d 338 (S.C. 1958), 17447, Delmar Studios of Carolinas v. Kinsey
South Carolina - 119 S.E.2d 533 (S.C. 1961), 17758, Standard Register Co. v. Kerrigan

See all quotations