213 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App. 1948), 24101, Perkins v. State

Citation: 213 S.W.2d 681, 152 Tex.Crim. 321

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: PERKINS v. STATE.

Attorney: Ernest S. Goens, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State. KRUEGER, Judge. From what we have said, it follows that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Case Date: Wednesday June 16, 1948

Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

213 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App. 1948), 24101, Perkins v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 253 S.W. 262 (Tex.Crim.App. 1922), 7219, King v. State
Texas - 148 S.W.2d 413 (Tex.Crim.App. 1941), 21464, Bussell v. State
Texas - 16 S.W.2d 818 (Tex.Crim.App. 1928), 11908, Enix v. State
Texas - 161 S.W.2d 78 (Tex.Crim.App. 1942), 21984, Davis v. State
Texas - 212 S.W.2d 516 (Tex.Crim.App. 1948), 24044, Stanfield v. State

See all quotations