148 S.W.2d 413 (Tex.Crim.App. 1941), 21464, Bussell v. State

Citation: 148 S.W.2d 413, 141 Tex.Crim. 268

Opinion Judge: KRUEGER, Judge. PER CURIAM.

Party Name: BUSSELL v. STATE.

Attorney: [141 Tex.Crim. 269] E. T. Miller and Cleo G. Clayton, Jr., both of Amarillo, for appellant. Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Case Date: Wednesday March 05, 1941

Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

148 S.W.2d 413 (Tex.Crim.App. 1941), 21464, Bussell v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 254 S.W. 572 (Tex.Crim.App. 1923), 7297, De Beauford v. State
Texas - 125 S.W.2d 574 (Tex.Crim.App. 1939), 20167, Price v. State
Texas - 128 S.W.2d 406 (Tex.Crim.App. 1939), 20198, Black v. State
Texas - 139 S.W.2d 820 (Tex.Crim.App. 1940), 21044, Zepeda v. State
Texas - 148 S.W.2d 424 (Tex.Crim.App. 1941), 21237, Converse v. State

See all quotations