21 Cal.App.3d 928, 10465, Stilson v. Moulton-Niguel Water Dist.

Citation: 21 Cal.App.3d 928, 98 Cal.Rptr. 914

Opinion Judge: [10] Gabbert

Party Name: Stilson v. Moulton-Niguel Water Dist.

Attorney: [7] Rimel, Harvey & Logan, Rimel, Harvey & Helsing, Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Bruce E. Clark, Donald R. Gail and Lawrence E. Stickney for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Levy & Van Bourg, Everett E. Demler and Thomas S. Mulligan for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: December 08, 1971

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

21 Cal.App.3d 928, 10465, Stilson v. Moulton-Niguel Water Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 116 Cal. 325, 15999, Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.
California - 145 Cal. 96, S. F. 3035, Green v. Soule
California - 22 Cal.2d 87, 18582, Burlingham v. Gray
California - 28 Cal.2d 33, 5680, Empire Star Mines Co. v. Cal. Emp. Com.
California - 44 Cal.2d 225, 23300, Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.

See all quotations