207 Cal.App.3d 852, C000659, Bach v. McNelis

Citation: 207 Cal.App.3d 852, 255 Cal.Rptr. 232

Opinion Judge: [10] Sparks

Party Name: Bach v. McNelis

Attorney: [7] Maxim N. Bach, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Coddington, Hicks & Danforth, Clinton H. Coddington, Richard G. Grotch, Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard and Thomas C. Hughes III for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: January 31, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

207 Cal.App.3d 852, C000659, Bach v. McNelis

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 404 U.S. 508 (1972), 70-92, California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
California - 200 Cal. 522, L. A. 9631, Fay v. District Court of Appeal
California - 42 Cal.2d 399, 6378, Pickens v. Johnson
California - 25 Cal.3d 474, 31140, Mosk v. Superior Court
California - 31 Cal.3d 637, 24307, In re Marriage of Flaherty

See all quotations