193 Cal.App.3d 1231, B022344, Weisman v. Bower

Citation: 193 Cal.App.3d 1231, 238 Cal.Rptr. 756

Opinion Judge: [10] Lui

Party Name: Weisman v. Bower

Attorney: [7] Shea & Gould, in pro. per., Jerold Fagelbaum and John G. Connolly for Objector and Appellant. [8] Crowley, Lebow & Cuneo, Arthur J. Crowley, Mark A. Brodka and Sarah J. Hoover for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday July 28, 1987

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

193 Cal.App.3d 1231, B022344, Weisman v. Bower

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 56 Cal.2d 355, 7274, Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court in and for Merced County
California - 22 Cal.3d 626, 23764, Bauguess v. Paine
California - 31 Cal.3d 637, 24307, In re Marriage of Flaherty
California - 140 Cal.App.3d 111, 21901, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Stockton Port Dist.
California - 143 Cal.App.3d 642, 67308, Ellis v. Roshei Corp.

See all quotations