[2014] 3 WLR 200

Core Citations

REPORTS OPINION

• R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) v Ministry of Justice; R (on the application of AM) v DPP

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Carter et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2012 BCSC 886
• Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al., (1993) 158 N.R. 1 (SCC)
• R. v. Oakes, (1986) 65 N.R. 87 (SCC)
• Carter et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2013 BCCA 435



See all quotations

• Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony et al. v. Alberta, (2009) 390 N.R. 202 (SCC)
• R. v. Edwards Books and Art Ltd., [1986] 2 SCR 713
• R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice (Attorney General and another intervening) R (AM) v DPP and Others (Same intervening) [DC]
• Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening)
• Sidaway (A.P.) v Bethlem Royal Hospital and The Maudesley Hospital Health Authority and Others
• R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Simon Kennedy
• R (Pretty) v DPP
• Airedale NHS Trust v Bland
• Myers v DPP
• R v DPP ex parte Kebeline
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
• R v Misra (Amit)
• Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment)
• A v B Plc and Another
• Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation)
• Smedleys Ltd v Breed
• R v David Michael Shayler
• R and Others v Secretary of State for Justice
• R (Sinclair Collis Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health
• Bellinger v Bellinger
• R (E and Others v DPP
• Shaw v Director of Public Prosecutions
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union
• Ward of Court (Pvs)
• Re B (Adult: Refusal of Treatment)
• Nicklinson v Ministry of Justice; R (on the applicaion of AM) v DPP