Shaw v Director of Public Prosecutions

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Richardson v Mellish
• Mogul Steamship Company v McGregor
• Bowman v Secular Society

[See more]

• R v Porter
• R v Brailsford
• Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Company v Veitch
• Upfill v Wright
• R v Bassey
• Pearce v Brooks

CONSIDERS

• Obscene Publications Act 1959
• Sexual Offences Act 1956 - Articles : S-1
• Vagrancy Act 1824

[See more]

• Obscene Publications Act 1959 - Articles : S-1
• Vagrancy Act 1898
• Sexual Offences Act 1956 - Articles : S-30
• Criminal Law Amendment Act 1912 - Articles : S-7
• Obscene Publications Act 1959 - Articles : S-2
• Street Offences Act 1959
• Adler v Dickson (Himalaya.)
• Mirehouse v Rennell
• R v Thomas
• R v Newland

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Shaw v DPP

APPLIES

• R v Berg, Britt, Carré and Lummies
• R v Hicklin

AFFIRMS

• Shaw v DPP

APPROVES

• R v Silver (Bernard) ; R v Falson (Albertine) ; R v Wilson (Patrick) ; R v Falson (Robert Laurent) ; R v Clement (Robert Edward) ; R v Delmaine (Wilfred Jerome) ; R v Moderadze (George) ; R v Blair (Maurice) ; R v Pullinger (Cyril)
• Calvert v Mayes
• R v Sir Francis-Blake Delaval, William Bates, and John Fraine

[See more]

• R v Mary Ann Mears and Amelia Chalk
• R v Howell

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1961] UKHL J0504-2
• [1962] AC 220

CITED in

• C v DPP
• B Munisar v Bookers Demerara Sugar Estates Ltd Attorney General of Guyana and DPP
• The State v Oswald Gobin and Boniface Griffith

[See more]

• Hall & Woodhouse Ltd v Poole Borough Council
• C (A Minor) v DPP

CONSIDERED in

• R v Malek and Reyes
• The Queen v Lucio Anthony Pepe

REFERRED in

• Crook v Edmondson
• R v Barker (no 1)
• Lai Hock Soon v Public Prosecutor

[See more]

• Glen Richardson v R
• Julian David Malcolm Reid Patrick John Appellants v The State [ECSC]
• Public Prosecutor v Kamaruzaman Mahmud

APPLIED in

• R v Quinn; R v Bloom

FOLLOWED in

• Iah Sin Seng v Public Prosecutor

This document cites

---

• Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Company v Veitch
• Shaw v DPP
• R v Sir Francis-Blake Delaval, William Bates, and John Fraine
• R v Newland
• The Queen v Read



See all quotations

• Upfill v Wright
• R v Porter
• R v Sir Francis-Blake Delaval, William Bates, and John Fraine
• Calvert v Mayes
• R v Brailsford
• R v Thomas
• R v Mary Ann Mears and Amelia Chalk
• Gaming. Jones against Randall
• R v Silver (Bernard) ; R v Falson (Albertine) ; R v Wilson (Patrick) ; R v Falson (Robert Laurent) ; R v Clement (Robert Edward) ; R v Delmaine (Wilfred Jerome) ; R v Moderadze (George) ; R v Blair (Maurice) ; R v Pullinger (Cyril)
• R v Berg, Britt, Carré and Lummies
• Pearce v Brooks
• Mirehouse v Rennell
• Bowman v Secular Society
• R v Howell
• R v Bassey
• Adler v Dickson (Himalaya.)
• R v Hicklin
• Mogul Steamship Company v McGregor
• Richardson v Mellish
• Sexual Offences Act 1956
• Obscene Publications Act 1959
• Street Offences Act 1959
• Offences Against Women Act 1849
• Vagrancy Act 1898
• Vagrancy Act 1824
• Criminal Law Amendment Act 1912