198 S.E.2d 261 (S.C. 1973), 19664, Abbott v. Arthur

Citation: 198 S.E.2d 261, 261 S.C. 31

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam:

Party Name: Barbara G. ABBOTT and Dean Abbott, Appellants, v. Joe ARTHUR and 97 other named Defendants, Individually and as representing theclass of all persons, corporations or others having or claiming any interest inany of the property described in Plat of Walden Estate Development, etc., Respondents.

Attorney: Claude R. Dunbar, Esq., of Spartanburg, for Appellants, cites: As to a change in dominant character of neighborhood along I-85: 187 S.E.2d 233; 358 Pa. 209, 56 A.2d 215, 2 A. L. R. (2d) 593, as reported in 2 A. L. R. (2d) 593; 358 Pa. 209, 2 A. L. R. (2d) 593; 239 S.C. 196, 122 S.E.2d 9; 225 S.C....

Case Date: Tuesday July 17, 1973

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

198 S.E.2d 261 (S.C. 1973), 19664, Abbott v. Arthur

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 100 S.E.2d 397 (S.C. 1957), 17345, Holling v. Margiotta
South Carolina - 122 S.E.2d 9 (S.C. 1961), 17838, Dunlap v. Beaty
South Carolina - 182 S.E.2d 671 (S.C. 1971), 19210, Easterly v. Hall
South Carolina - 187 S.E.2d 233 (S.C. 1972), 19380, Flinkingshelt v. Johnson
South Carolina - 46 S.E.2d 874 (S.C. 1948), 16059, Sprouse v. Winston

See all quotations