187 S.E.2d 233 (S.C. 1972), 19380, Flinkingshelt v. Johnson

Citation: 187 S.E.2d 233, 258 S.C. 77

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam:

Party Name: Emma L. FLINKINGSHELT, Individually and as Trustee, and Larry R. Flinkingshelt, both of whom represent a class, Appellants, v. John E. JOHNSON, Jr., et al., Respondents.

Attorney: Messrs. Robert A. Clay and Price & Poag, of Greenville, for Appellants, cite: As to the Trial Judge's committing reversible error in not striking 38 explanations, evidentiary in nature, to answers to requests for admissions, such explanations not explaining why the requests could not be admitted ...

Case Date: Monday March 06, 1972

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

187 S.E.2d 233 (S.C. 1972), 19380, Flinkingshelt v. Johnson

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 104 S.E.2d 344 (S.C. 1958), 17448, Somerset v. Reyner
South Carolina - 122 S.E.2d 9 (S.C. 1961), 17838, Dunlap v. Beaty
South Carolina - 187 S.E.2d 224 (S.C. 1972), 19381, Ballard v. State
South Carolina - 54 S.E.2d 538 (S.C. 1949), 16236, Pitts v. Brown
South Carolina - 81 S.E.2d 37 (S.C. 1954), 16848, Martin v. Cantrell