196 A.2d 792 (N.J. 1964), A--59, Morris v. Postma

Citation: 196 A.2d 792, 41 N.J. 354

Opinion Judge: [9] Per Curiam

Party Name: Howard MORRIS, Edward Morris and Rose Morris, partners, trading as Carick Realty Co., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Nicholas W. POSTMA, Building Inspector of the Borough of Fair Lawn, and the Planning Board of the Borough of Fair Lawn, Defendants-Respondents. Howard MORRIS, Edward Morris and Rose Morris, partners, trading as Carick Realty Co., Plaintif

Attorney: [6] Mr. Howard Stern argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Shavick, Thevos, Stern, Schotz & Steiger, attorneys).

Case Date: Monday January 20, 1964

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

196 A.2d 792 (N.J. 1964), A--59, Morris v. Postma

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 124 A.2d 48 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1956), No. A--289, The Van Corporation & Stillman & Hoag, Inc. v. The Mayor & Council of Borough of Ridgefield
New Jersey - 139 A.2d 42 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1958), No. A--557, Roselle v. The Mayor and Council of The Borough of Moonachie
New Jersey - 161 A.2d 241 (N.J. 1960), Tremarco Corp. v. Garzio
New Jersey - 168 A.2d 52 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1961), A--785, Bern v. Borough of Fair Lawn
New Jersey - 174 A.2d 497 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1961), A--914, Sautto v. Edenboro Apartments, Inc.

See all quotations