124 A.2d 48 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1956), No. A--289, The Van Corporation & Stillman & Hoag, Inc. v. The Mayor & Council of Borough of Ridgefield

Citation: 124 A.2d 48, 41 N.J.Super. 74

Opinion Judge: Goldmann, S.J.A.D.

Party Name: THE VAN CORPORATION AND STILLMAN & HOAG, INC., CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, AND JAMES LAURIA, BUILDING INSPECTOR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

Attorney: Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for appellants. Mr. Abram A. Lebson argued the cause for respondents (Messrs Lebson & Prigoff, attorneys).

Judge Panel: Goldmann, Freund and Conford.

Case Date: Friday July 13, 1956

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

124 A.2d 48 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1956), No. A--289, The Van Corporation & Stillman & Hoag, Inc. v. The Mayor & Council of Borough of Ridgefield

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites