193 Cal.App.3d 249, G002324, Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek

Citation: 193 Cal.App.3d 249, 239 Cal.Rptr. 319

Opinion Judge: [11] Wallin

Party Name: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek

Attorney: [7] Jack L. White, City Attorney, Oliver, Stoever & Laskin, Thomas W. Stoever and Charles S. Vose for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Weiser, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Bruce D. Ballmer, R. Bruce Tepper, Jr., and Kathryn Reimann as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. [9] Rutan & Tucker,...

Case Date: June 30, 1987

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

193 Cal.App.3d 249, G002324, Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 52 Cal.2d 299, 25275, People v. Chevalier
California - 61 Cal.2d 21, 26751, In re Bunker Hill Urban Renewal Project 1B of CommunityRedevelopment Agency of City of Los Angeles
California - 11 Cal.3d 28, 30009, Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.
California - 11 Cal.3d 506, 30139, Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles
California - 13 Cal.3d 205, 30250, San Diego Bldg. Contractors Assn. v. City Council

See all quotations