173 Cal.App.3d 1029, G001733, Dusek v. Redevelopment Agency

Citation: 173 Cal.App.3d 1029, 219 Cal.Rptr. 346

Opinion Judge: [10] Wallin

Party Name: Dusek v. Redevelopment Agency

Attorney: [7] Rutan & Tucker, Leonard A. Hampel, Jeffrey M. Oderman and Craig Labadie for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] William P. Hopkins, City Attorney, Weiser, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Bruce D. Ballmer, Kathryn Reimann, Lance E. Garber and R. Bruce Tepper, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: October 30, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

173 Cal.App.3d 1029, G001733, Dusek v. Redevelopment Agency

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 13 Cal.3d 263, 30307, Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Com.
California - 100 Cal.App.3d 789, 56376, Karlson v. City of Camarillo
California - 122 Cal.App.3d 813, 19359, Sutter Sensible Planning, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors
California - 131 Cal.App.3d 350, 19741, Environmental Planning & Information Council v. County of El Dorado
California - 134 Cal.App.3d 1022, 25486, Village Laguna of Laguna Beach, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

See all quotations