190 S.E.2d 578 (Ga.App. 1972), 47031, Moody v. Southland Inv. Corp.

Citation: 190 S.E.2d 578, 126 Ga.App. 225

Party Name: Shirley A. MOODY v. SOUTHLAND INVESTMENT CORPORATION.

Attorney: 2. The evidence does not show that plaintiff was guilty of such negligence as to bar recovery as a matter of law., On the day of the occurrence plaintiff, plaintiff's daughter, and the Williams' party arrived at the apartment sometime between 1 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff first entered the apart...

Case Date: Friday May 05, 1972

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

190 S.E.2d 578 (Ga.App. 1972), 47031, Moody v. Southland Inv. Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Arizona - 399 P.2d 723 (Ariz.App. 1965), 2 CA-CIV 26, Vegodsky v. City of Tucson
Georgia - 191 S.E. 265 (Ga.App. 1937), 26053, Georgia-Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. White
Georgia - 100 S.E.2d 478 (Ga.App. 1957), 36811, Shannon v. Bigelow-sanford Carpet Co.
Georgia - 105 S.E.2d 399 (Ga.App. 1958), 37207, Shirley v. Woods
Georgia - 119 S.E.2d 723 (Ga.App. 1961), 38761, Brand v. Pope

See all quotations